This morning,Â PeopleÂ announced that the 2017 winner of their long-standing “The World’s Most Beautiful Woman” title would beÂ Pretty Woman’sÂ Julia Roberts.Â That was theÂ peg:Â Pretty Woman. As in, the filmÂ that came out 27 years ago, whose first-time theater viewers are now 40+. Two true things: Roberts is gorgeous (a dream, really) and this choice feels like a #tbt in cover form, and not just because she’s been around for a while.
â€” People Magazine (@people) April 19, 2017
“The stunning star is, for a record fifth time, the Most Beautiful Woman in the World â€“ though she can hardly believe it,” reports People.Â “‘I am very flattered,’ she tells Peopleâ€™s editor-in-chief Jess Cagle in this weekâ€™s cover story.”
Roberts is 49. That’s cool — it’s nice to see what many women consider “the invisible decade” highlighted. And this cover will probably sell a lot of magazines. I mean, that smile. That glow! Less cool — and so obvious — is its blatant enforcement of and praise forÂ a particular, narrow beauty standard. I guess it goes without saying that aÂ “most beautiful” contest feels almost comically presumptuous and out of place in today’s conversations around beauty. To argue that it should have been someone else would probably just be missing the point. MoreÂ interesting than trying to ascertain the motive behind People’sÂ choice isÂ the internet’s reaction it. Gone are the days of these decisions ending in a mailed subscriber/magazine stand vacuum. Today, they echo immediately, and in this case, the resulting back-and-forth delivered.
Here are some of the first reactions to People’s tweet, expressed via gif:
â€” Ashley Ja’Terria (@All_N_Yo_Tweets) April 19, 2017
â€” jamie (@hyghforthis) April 19, 2017
â€” hellresidentNY (@hellresidentNY) April 19, 2017
â€” Â¯_(ãƒ„)_/Â¯ (@BirdG81) April 19, 2017
The choice’s dÃ©jÃ vu nature doesn’t seem to be lost on anyone:
â€” LiNCOLN PARK (@linc0lnpark) April 19, 2017
@people I was fine with Sandra, I let Jennifer slide (again) but picking Julia for the 5th time is just tragic.
â€” Hott Chocolate (@BlakKofee) April 19, 2017
â€” sá´›á´€á´„Ê� (@StacySuperDuper) April 19, 2017
@people Y’all gotta hire new people. This ain’t the 90’s/00’s
â€” EyeLuvBeyoncÃ© (@SenorElNegro) April 19, 2017
People’s Most Beautiful Woman feels like a perpetual baton pass between Julia Roberts and Jennifer Aniston. https://t.co/DIkDNADlOT
â€” Ashley Spencer (@AshleyySpencer) April 19, 2017
Y’all couldn’t find anyone else? Like…anyone else? https://t.co/YRewwmaRxc
â€” Morgan Jerkins (@MorganJerkins) April 19, 2017
And my personal favorite:
@people IT’S 2017
â€” adri. (@_adrianaagarcia) April 19, 2017
It’s not that images or designations like this have no power — they do, representation matters — it’s that, this time, the conversation isÂ pivoting more around head-shaking and eye-rolling than anything else. The internet’s seeming desireÂ to laugh this the fuck offÂ says something about the relevance of this weird little beauty pageant. And, perhaps more importantly, my spending more time looking at gifs on Twitter about it than reading the article itself hints that across the board, these conversations are more in the hands of consumers than they’ve ever been. A story doesn’t just end at the final sentence on a page anymore. The reactions areÂ becoming an equal playing partÂ within the larger narrative.Â So we’ll watch as more reactions come in today, but something tells meÂ this won’t stay top-of-mind for long. And in the context of this outdated competition, I’m not complaining.
How do you feel about it?
Photo by LOIC VENANCE/AFP/ via Getty Images.
The post â€˜Peopleâ€™ Choosing Julia Roberts as ‘Most Beautiful’ is Less Interesting Than the Response appeared first on Man Repeller.
SOURCE: Man Repeller – Read entire story here.